Skip to main content

Full text of "Getting Ready for 1975"

See other formats


GETTING READY 
FOR 1975 


T. H. REDFERN 


Two Shillings and sixpence 



GETTING READY 
FOR 1975 


by 

T. H. REDFERN 


THE BLAVATSKY LECTURE 

% 

delivered at the Annual Convention of 
The Theosophical Society in England 
at Besant Hall, London 
May 20th, 1961 


THE THEOSOPHICAL PUBLISHING HOUSE, LONDON, LTD 

68 Great Russell Street, W.C.l 


Sold by 

The Theosophical Press 
Wheaton. Illinois 





By the same Author: 

THE WORK AND WORTH OF MME BLAVATSKY 


Made and printed in England by 

STAPLES PRINTERS LIMITED 

at their Rochester , Kent, establishment 


GETTING READY FOR 1975 


THE ALONENESS AND RESPONSIBILITY OF 
FREEDOM TO THINK 

Every one of us in The Theosophicai Society is free to hold in 
brotherly fashion whatever opinions appear to him to be true. As we 
progress towards Theosophy the need to know is intensified (i). We 
find that we have to think things out for ourselves. Acceptance of 
attractive ideas as beliefs is not enough. ‘Theosophists’, Mme 
Blavatsky said, ‘accept nothing in the name of faith ’ ( 2 ); and ‘Theo¬ 
sophy is for those who can think, or for those who can drive them¬ 
selves to think, not mental sluggards’ ( 3 ). Sluggardness in thinking 
is an obstacle we meet, and in our Lodges we shall make more 
Theosophicai progress in the mental aspect of our bi-polar work by 
helping one another in acquiring greater competence in thinking, 
rather than by stuffing our minds with data. 

Thinking results in self-dependence and self-responsibility, which 
is radical to Theosophicai living as Mme Blavatsky expounded it. 
Two other sentences can well be used occasionally to measure our¬ 
selves by, if we think them true. Mme Blavatsky’s declaration that 
‘Every Theosophist is a nonconformist’ ( 4 ); and Thomas Vaughan’s 
definition of a Theosophist: \ .. an original thinker . .. abandoning 
the old pathway of routine and entering on the solitary pathway of 
independent thought—Godward ... a seeker after the Eternal Truth, 
with an inspiration of his own to solve the Eternal Problems’ ( 5 ). 

THE INADEQUACY OF THOUGHT ALONE 

As we work to improve our capacities as independent thinkers, not 
conforming for any cause other than honest concurrence, we have 
before us the warning that ‘the Mind is the great Slayer of the 
Real’ ( 6 ). The I-making function is focused in the mind. It is the 
source of the alone-standing capacity we have to develop theosophic- 


3 


ally, but in the Indian image we have to learn how to be seated 
‘between the wings of the great bird’ ( 7 ), the Hamsa, or swan; that 
is, to repose in the creative Word beyond the dualities of mind. The 
competence of mind, necessary for our wayfaring, is the cause of 
prideful, spiritual disaster unless coupled with an equally developed 
realization that the powers used by our minds are universal, appro¬ 
priated individually by every human and superhuman being. 
Coupled with our intelligent nonconformity we need the awareness 
of community and, arising from this, harmonious adaptive skill in 
living relationships, without sacrifice of the integrity of our growing 
independence. For many of us this is difficult, but we can work at it 
by helpful friendliness regardless of differences, discernment of the 
measure of truth mutually recognized, and a tender and sensitive care 
in propounding ideas not yet acceptable to our brother-individuals. 

MME BLAVATSKY AS THE AGENT OF LIBERATED MEN 

Our Society was formed in New York by a group of men and 
women attracted by the ideas being propounded through the power¬ 
ful personality of Mme Blavatsky; and she said she was acting as the 
agent of a Brotherhood of men who have lived many times on earth, 
have won the mastery of human problems by effort and insight, 
secured release from the compulsion to be reborn, and attained 
remarkable powers over nature through greater knowledge. Being 
free from necessitous reincarnation, they yet voluntarily return to 
birth to stand by and help the rest of us, in so far as we will pay heed. 

The setting of the Society’s origin therefore presents a radical 
challenge to the inquiring member. He is free as to the conclusion he 
reaches; he can take all the time he needs to investigate and think 
about it. Provided he accepts and acts upon the objects of the Society, 
he need not reach a conclusion, and it does not matter to the Society 
what his conclusion is; but a whole life-transforming philosophy is 
wrapped up in the acceptance of Mme Blavatsky’s claim. She was 
either lying, or deluded, or she spoke the truth. If she spoke the truth, 
then what she had to say, on behalf of those whom she represented, 
must merit the most careful attention; for they have solved what we 
are still up against, are able to help mankind, are offering help and 
seeking collaborators. This is stupendous in its implications. It 
means that, mankind badly needing wise guidance, that guidance is 


4 


available. This is of such importance that the challenge to inquire 
into its validity is well-nigh inescapable. 

I hold that Mme Blavatsky bore true witness, partly because her 
life and works make sense only upon her own explanation of what she 
was doing and of the sources of her inspiration and information; 
partly because I can find nothing more probable than the main 
themes of the teachings she transmitted to explain the radical 
problems of life; and partly from a measure of confirmation in my 
own experience. 


TEACHINGS FOR TESTING 

Mme Blavatsky did not say: ‘these are true teachings: believe 
them’. In effect she said: consider them, examine them, disprove 
them if you can. Reject whatever you can disprove. If you cannot 
disprove them, then let your mind be open to them as possibilities, 
or as probabilities if your reason or intuition gives you that endorse¬ 
ment. In so far as your own practical experience confirms them, 
place your faith unhesitatingly in that knowledge. 

THE CENTENNIAL EFFORT OF THE LIBERATED MEN 

Among these teachings are several declarations that her work and 
the foundation of our Society was the nineteenth-century expression 
of a recurrent endeavour by the Brotherhood of redeemed and 
liberated men whom she served, to enlighten the people of the world 
about spiritual realities. This has been made in the last quarter of 
every century since the time of Tsongkhapa, the reformer of Tibetan 
Buddhism. Obviously there are inspired teachers at other times, but 
there is a special rhythmic centennial effort on occult lines. 

Mme Blavatsky’s words were: 

‘Among the commandments of Tsong-Kha-pa there is one that 
enjoins the Rahats (Arhats) to make an attempt to enlighten the 
world, including the “white barbarians”, every century, at a 
certain specified period of the cycle. Up to the present day none of 
these attempts has been very successful’ ( 8 ). 

. The adepts . . . send forth a messenger to try to teach the 
world in the last quarter of each century, and the Theosophical 
Society represents their work for this epoch’ ( 9 ). 


5 


‘Every century an attempt is being made to show the world that 
occultism is no vain superstition. Once the door (is) permitted to 
be kept (remain) a little ajar, it will be opened wider with every 
new century. The times are ripe for a more serious knowledge than 
hitherto permitted, though still very limited, so far* (io). 

‘No Master of Wisdom from the East will himself appear or 
send anyone to Europe or America .. . until the year 1975’ (i i). 

‘. .. During the last quarter of every hundred years an attempt 
is made by those “Masters” of whom I have spoken, to help on the 
spiritual progress of Humanity in a marked and definite way. 
Towards the close of each century you will invariably find that an 
outpouring or upheaval of spirituality—or call it mysticism if you 
prefer—has taken place. Some one or more persons have appeared 
in the world as their agents, and a greater or less amount of occult 
knowledge and teaching has been given out. If you care to do so, 
you can trace these movements back, century by century’ (12). 

HISTORICAL CHECK 

If this be true it follows that history should bear the impress of 
these similar endeavours in previous centuries, and another such 
effort about 1975 can be anticipated. The modern Theosophical 
Movement was launched towards the end of the last century, and 
expanded as a public force in this twentieth century. There was dis¬ 
cussion at its inception as to whether it would be better to have a 
secret or a public society, and an open policy was decided on; but 
some of the earlier efforts may have been more secret. In the West 
the central figure in the eighteenth century appears to have been 
Le Comte de Saint-Germain, with Cagliostro, Anton Mesmer and 
Louis Claude de Saint Martin also prominent. They were reported 
to be collaborating in efforts to promote conciliation and clarification 
among Masonic and related movements through the Convention of 
Wilhelmsbad (1782-5) and the Convention of Paris (1784-7); and to 
be fellow-members in the Lodge of the Reunited Friends (13). This 
is, however, inconsistent with other reports and incompatibilities 
may have developed (14). 

Nothing outstanding in the way of occult energizing is conspicuous 
in the last quarter of the seventeenth century, but there were promi¬ 
nent men, with known Rosicrucian interests, working on theosophical 


6 


lines in England throughout the century, and some of them were 
initiated into Freemasonry although they had no known connection 
with practical construction-work. Emblematical Freemasonry, which 
has theosophical quality both in the standards it inculcates and the 
symbolism it employs, burgeoned forth after the formation of the 
Grand Lodge of England in 1717. Clearly something had been 
‘cooking’ in this connection in the seventeenth century, but any 
attempt to trace it is more speculative than Freemasonry itself, 
though there was a report of a ‘great Convention of the Fraternity of 
Adopted Masons’ in 1691, when ‘Christopher Wren was adopted a 
Brother’, and in a work published in 1686 it is recorded that the ‘most 
eminent quality did not disdain to be of this Fellowship’ (15). 

Something similar happened a century before. There was a surge 
of Rosicrucian publicity set off mainly by Fama Fratemitatis and 
Confessio Fratemitatis , published in 1614 and 1615 respectively (16), 
but tracing back before that the movement fades into obscurity. 
There is evidence to show that Fama Fratemitatis had circulated in 
manuscript for some years before appearing in print, and that the 
original version was tampered with when printed (17). Adam 
Haselmeyer, who published a reply to the Laudable Fraternity of the 
Theosophists of Rosen Creutz in 1612, testified that he saw and read 
Fama Fratemitatis in 1610 (18). Julius Sperber declared that it was 
known otherwise for over nineteen years before it was first printed, 
which would take us back at least to 1595 (19). The movement may 
well have originated in secret in the sixteenth century, but there is no 
final proof (20). 

Looking back then to see if history confirms the thesis of a centen¬ 
nial impulse on occult lines, we have two centuries in which the 
evidence is clear, preceded by two in which nothing adequate is on 
the known record, but in both cases developments emerged on a 
significant scale in the quarter subsequent to that in which such an 
impulse is said to have taken place, and could have done in secret, 
forming the preparation for what occurred afterwards. The record 
then is inconclusive; it is not strong enough to base acceptance on it, 
but it is consistent with Mme Blavatsky’s declarations. We are there¬ 
fore dependent primarily on our evaluations of her testimony. This I 
find sufficiently convincing to say it is probably true, the evidence of 
history is consistent with it, and if it is true it is very important for 
mankind, so important that those of us who have not satisfied our- 


7 


selves about it may well feel that it deserves our attention. Those who 
are satisfied may agree that in 1961, fourteen years before the centen¬ 
ary of our Society, we should have a good look at our responsibilities 
in this connection. 

TWENTIETH CENTURY CHANGES 

Let us consider then the situation as it has developed since the last 
quarter of the nineteenth century. The technological and scientific 
advances are marvellous—millions fly by air every year; electric 
power has transformed manufacture; electronics has revolutionized 
communications; through cybernetics the machine is transcending 
the human brain in mathematics; atomic power promises either 
unheard-of devastation and misery or world-wide prosperity; matter 
has been found to be insubstantial as pattern-bound energy whose 
different qualities arise from number; hereditary characteristics are 
found to depend on gene-patterns and hence also on number; the 
astronomical horizons have been extended until our sun seems 
relatively insignificant in the ordered myriads of stars, and our planet 
almost negligible in the cosmic vastness; man on it is firing explora¬ 
tory missiles into solar space and planning expeditions to the moon 
and other planets; strange visitations are reported in our skies of 
machines that behave like no earth-made vehicles. The psycho¬ 
analytical movement has swept away all public reticence in the dis¬ 
cussion of sexual functioning, physiological and psychological, 
normal and aberrant, undermining so-called Christian standards of 
behaviour in the West. Politically, colonialism has been overthrown, 
apart from the final stages. India is free, Africa in turmoil, and a 
materialistic political philosophy based on the writings of Karl Marx 
forms the intellectual framework for a revolutionary movement that 
has overswept Russia, China and other parts of Asia and Eastern 
Europe and seeks with insistent energy to penetrate the rest of the 
world. Tibet—described by an Eastern Adept as ‘the last corner of 
the globe not so entirely corrupted as to preclude the mingling 
together of the two atmospheres, the physical and the spiritual’ (21) 
—has succumbed. Its holy places are desecrated and the Dalai Lama 
is in exile. Advertising excites all the desires that commercial enter¬ 
prise craves to satisfy, and the bulk of mankind are starved or under¬ 
fed. With the peril by nuclear war facing humanity, the so-called 
United Nations are torn asunder by sordid lusts for power, side by 

8 


side with healing, educational and economic work carried on for the 
good of mankind against odds that call forth the highest degrees of 
faith and courage. Fear drives men to conventional religion, and 
inquiring minds in the West reach out for Eastern teachings, often 
without the needed discrimination. Verily this is Kali Yuga, and not 
half! 

CYCLIC DESTINY 

The destiny of the world moves in cycles that have cosmic correla¬ 
tives and karmic fulfilments, said the Eastern Adepts in the teachings 
of the 1875-91 instruction-period, and they are powerless to stop it 
‘from going on its destined direction*; but they can ‘divert some part 
of its energy’, just as hydraulic engineers can use great rivers for the 
good of mankind and draw off water for irrigation. To what extent 
they can do this depends on how much help they can get from folks 
like us. The formation of The Theosophical Society was one such 
effort to help by giving the Western nations ‘a secure basis upon 
which to reconstruct their crumbling faith .. . the evidence that 
Asiatic psychology alone supplies’. ‘Give this’, an Adept wrote, ‘and 
you will confer happiness of mind on thousands. The era of blind 
faith is gone; that of inquiry is here. Inquiry that only unmasks error, 
without discovering anything upon which the soul can build, will but 
make iconoclasts. Iconoclasm, from its very destructiveness, can give 
nothing; it can only raze. But man cannot be satisfied with bare 
negation. ... This is the moment to guide the recurrent impulse 
which must come, and which will push the age towards extreme 
atheism, or drag it back to extreme sacerdotalism, if it is not led to the 
primitive soul-satisfying philosophy of the Aryans* (22). In the cyclic 
course, England is on the eve of a catastrophe, France nearing a 
significant point in her cycle, and Europe in general ‘on the eve of a 
cataclysm, which her own Cycle of racial Karma has led her to’ (23). 
A Terreur was prognosticated, which would ‘affect all Europe when it 
comes, and not one country alone’ (24). In the next great geological 
upheaval, the British Isles will be the first to go, ‘destroyed by fire 
(submarine volcanoes) and water, France and other lands will follow 
suit’ (25), as the continent for the sixth Root Race is prepared. 

THE THEOSOPHISTS* TASK 

In this predestined cycle, which cannot be arrested but may be 
modified, the inevitable karmic suffering of mankind can be lightened. 


9 


The London Lodge was told by an Adept, through its treasurer, that 
they had in their custody, ‘a movement calculated to benefit an 
English-speaking world’, they should ‘keep in correspondence with 
all the others in Europe. . . . This is a movement for all Europe, not 
for London only, remember’. They should link with the American 
members also; and they were told that, if they did their whole duty, 
‘the progress of materialism, the increase of dangerous self- 
indulgence, and the tendency towards spiritual suicide, can be 
checked. . . . The pendulum has swung from the extreme of blind 
faith towards the extreme materialistic skepticism, and nothing can 
stop it save Theosophy. Is this not a thing worth working for to save 
those nations from the doom their ignorance is preparing for 
them?’ (26). In 1884, the same Adept wrote to Mr. Sinnett that the 
crisis that was then ‘shaking the T.S. to its foundation’ was ‘a 
question of perdition or salvation to thousands; a question of the 
progress of the Human Race or its retrogression, of its glory or 
dishonour’. It was even an issue 'of being or not beings of annihilation, 
in fact.. (27). That was the measure of the importance of getting 

Theosophy across, to the Adept vision. 

Looking forward to the twentieth century, Mme Blavatsky asked 
in a well-known passage: ‘what has the new cycle in store for 
humanity? Will it be merely a continuation of the present, only in 
darker and more terrible colours? Or shall a new day dawn for man¬ 
kind, a day of pure sunlight, of truth, of charity, of true happiness 
for all?* Her answer was that it ‘depends mainly on the few Theo- 
sophists who, true to their colours through good repute and ill, still 
fight the battle of Truth against the powers of Darkness. ... If, 
Theosophy prevailing in the struggle, its all-embracing philosophy 
strikes deep root into the minds and hearts of men, if its doctrines of 
Reincarnation and Karma, in other words, of Hope and Responsi¬ 
bility, find a home in the lives of the new generations, then, indeed, 
will dawn the day of joy and gladness for all who now suffer and are 
outcast. For real Theosophy is altruism. ... It is brotherly love, 
mutual help, unswerving devotion to Truth. If once men do but 
realize that in these alone can true happiness be found, and never in 
wealth, possessions, or any selfish gratification, then the dark clouds 
will roll away, and a new humanity will be born upon earth. Then, 
the golden age will be there, indeed. But if not, then the storm will 
burst, and our boasted western civilization and enlightenment will 


10 


sink in such a sea of horror that its parallel History has never yet 
recorded’ (28). Elsewhere she wrote, in 1889, that ‘. . . if the Theo- 
sophical Society survives and lives true to its mission, to its original 
impulses through the next hundred years ... earth will be a heaven 
in the twenty-first century in comparison with what it is now!’ (29). 
It is by Theosophy manifesting in Theosophists, that this can be 
done, and they may be outside The Theosophical Society or in it, and 
they may be called Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, Humanists, or 
bear any other label. There may be many Theosophists who have 
never heard of Theosophy. The Theosophical Society will be the 
instrument only if it is ‘true to its mission’, and being a member of it 
does not make any one of us into a Theosophist. 

THE CYCLIC DEADLINE 

Before we have a look at how we are doing in this task, and where 
we are up to, let us note a particularly significant passage from Mme 
Blavatsky’s writings: 

‘The vindication of the Occultists and their Archaic Science is 
working itself slowly but steadily into the very heart of society, 
hourly, daily and yearly, in the shape of two monster branches, 
two stray off-shoots of the trunk of Magic—Spiritualism and the 
Roman Church. Fact works its way very often through fiction. 
Like an immense boa-constrictor, Error, in every shape encircles 
mankind, trying to smother in her deadly coils every aspiration 
towards truth and light. But Error is powerful only on the surface, 
prevented as she is by Occult Nature from going any deeper, for 
the same Occult Nature encircles the whole globe, in every direc¬ 
tion, leaving not even the darkest corner unvisited. And, whether 
by phenomenon or miracle, by spirit hook or bishop’s crook, 
Occultism must win the day, before the present era reaches 
“Shani’s (Saturn’s) triple septenary” of the Western Cycle in 
Europe, in other words—before the end of the twenty-first 
century “a.d.” ’ (30). 

Our Elder Brethren think and plan in a wide sweep of time. On 
this showing the centennial effort around a.d. 2075 will be a last 
ditch affair. 1975 is crucial. What part can the Theosophical Move¬ 
ment play in 1975 and the immediately following years? What has the 
1875 energization yielded so far? 


U 


PROGRESS IN THE THEOSOPHICAL OBJECTIVES 

The assumption that a man is inferior because he has a skin of a 
different colour is rapidly passing away. Disdain for other religions is 
diminishing, except that a new and widespread superiority-cult has 
arisen in Marxism, which is contemptuous of all religion. Women are 
securing emancipation, though it comes slowly in the Islamic and 
Hindu settings. The artificial barriers to brotherhood are dissolving, 
but there is still a great need for more and more groups where 
universal brotherhood is exemplified in practice. The Theosophical 
Society is no longer the pioneering advance party in this work, but 
every Lodge can well make itself a manifesting centre for it. 

Comparative religion has advanced apace and mutual respect 
between religions has increased remarkably, with Christianity rather 
sheepishly trying to hold on to its superiority as being founded by 
God’s only Son, fantastic as that seems in the context of the new 
astronomy. The idea of reincarnation is slowly and hazily permeating 
the public mind in the West. Scientific knowledge is widely dis¬ 
seminated by television, newspapers and books. Philosophy is little 
popularized, being marked in the West by an arid intellectualism, 
though a philosophy of science is being cultivated. 

The investigation of unexplained phenomena of the human psyche 
proceeds laboriously in university groups and has established the 
factuality of extrasensory perception. Our human evolution being 
at the stage it is, the first attempted practical application has been to 
see if it can be used to find out what is in the enemy’s mind for 
military advantage (31). The occult doctrines were given a clarifica¬ 
tion and new impetus by the energization of 1875-91 and its 
continuum. This was centred in The Theosophical Society which 
was intended to be a united body, providing for the widest variety of 
approach-ways through autonomous Lodges, combined in a world 
organization of brotherly sympathy for diverse efforts (32). That 
unity has been lost, our Adyar society being the largest and most 
widely active. There have been a multitude of lesser organizations 
formed for the dissemination of the hitherto occult doctrines, with 
various degrees of intelligence and honourableness. The gullibility of 
desireful mankind is being commercially exploited even in his 
longing for wisdom. 


12 


THE DEVELOPING THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT 


In the direct Theosophical stream, following on the withdrawal of 
W. Q. Judge and his supporters, the Point Loma enterprises appear 
to be petering out in fragmentation. The United Lodges, formed 
under the inspiration of Robert Crosbie and laying almost exclusive 
emphasis on the writings of Mme Blavatsky and W. Q. Judge, 
seem enduringly established. In the Adyar Society we went through 
a phase of englamoured devotion to Annie Besant and C. W. 
Leadbeater in which the reasonably critical faculty was not sufficiently 
exercised. We were given an exposition of the Adepts as working in 
a systematized hierarchy; the proclamation of Krishnamurti as the 
intended vehicle of a high Adept known as the World Teacher, 
despite Mme Blavatsky’s express statement that the Masters of the 
Wisdom would not send another emissary to Europe or America 
until 1975; the formation of The Liberal Catholic Church: the 
deflection of interests and energies into Co-Masonry; and the 
emergence of a vast literature through the hand of Mrs. Alice A. 
Bailey purporting to emanate from a Tibetan Master of Wisdom, 
which again flies in the teeth of the Blavatsky pronouncement about 
no further messenger until 1975. Since Mrs. Besant and Mr. Lead¬ 
beater passed on we have experienced a renewed interest in the 
Blavatsky writings; a greater attention to The Secret Doctrine ; a 
slowly permeating impact from Mr. Krishnamurti, who has turned 
out to be the most distinguished public figure to arise from the 
Theosophical Movement in this century so far, as well as the most 
cathartic; a similar slow permeation of Bailey teachings; and the 
development of honest attempts to appraise the various doctrines, in 
the forefront of which is the Science Group of The Theosophical 
Research Centre in this country. Where do we go from here? 


THE FALLIBILITY OF THE LEADERS 

Neither the Adepts nor Mme Blavatsky ever claimed infallibility. 
Indeed the possibility of mistakes was emphasized. Annie Besant and 
C. W. Leadbeater made similar declarations (33), though their 
conviction did not encourage probing questions. We know now some 
mistakes that were made. A simple one was Annie Besant’s correction 
of a reference to Bodhidharma, the first Patriarch of Chinese 


i3 


Buddhism, to the Bodhidharma, or Wisdom Religion, in The Voice of 
the Silence (34). This was natural enough, for Zen Buddhism had 
hardly been heard of in the West then, and the name had been used 
in the second sense in the next note; but Mme Blavatsky was right 
and the correction was misleading. I yield to no one in admiration of 
Annie Besant, but she was not beyond error. A more glaring example 
was her amending of the text of The Voice of the Silence in respect of 
the teaching concerning Pratyeka Buddhas. Mrs. Besant said Mme 
Blavatsky had asked her to make this correction, ‘as she had, in a 
careless moment, copied such a statement elsewhere* (34). In fact 
Mme Blavatsky had stated the Pratyeka doctrine in three places (36), 
a reference has since appeared also in The Mahatma Letters (37), and 
the spate of literature on Tibetan religion since then all bears out that 
Mme Blavatsky was correctly transmitting the Mahayana teaching. It 
was not disclosed until much later that Mrs. Besant had acted not on 
a request from Mme Blavatsky whilst living in the body of that name, 
but upon a psychic communication purporting to come from her 
after her death (38). Nonetheless, Mr. Leadbeater embraced the 
Pratyeka Buddhas as synonymous with the Three Kumaras who 
assist Sanat Kumara in his schemata of the Hierarchy (39), and that 
just makes us ridiculous in the eyes of the knowledgeable world of 
scholarship if we continue to perpetuate it. An odd thing is that this 
Besant-Leadbeater distortion of the Pratyeka Buddha doctrine is 
carried over into the Alice Bailey expositions (40). If those do 
emanate from a high Tibetan initiate, how does it come about that 
a well-known Mahayana term is used in a way foreign to Tibetan 
thought and contrary to the meaning given in The Mahatma Letters , 
The Secret Doctrine and The Voice of the Silence ? To ask that question 
does not deny value to the Bailey writings, for high inspiration does 
not necessarily bring correct attribution (41). It does point to the 
need for keen discrimination in reading. 


SHAPING THE FUTURE 

Looking back then we can see that a major impact upon the 
thinking of mankind was made, primarily through the agency of 
Mme Blavatsky, in the period from 1875 to 1891. Neither in the 
literature of the time, nor in subsequent expositions, has there been 
anything of the nature of infallible scriptures, but we have a heritage 


of mind-stretching and thought-provoking doctrines on which to 
exercise our intelligences and intuitions: and with them we are 
exhorted to altruistic living of a high order, for which the philosophy 
provides an intelligible foundation. 

In facing the inevitability of living, we need the most likely explana¬ 
tions we can find on what life is about and the sensible way of going 
about the business of living. If Theosophy be true we shall find that 
we have made a large part of the world that affects us: and that being 
so, if we dislike it, we can re-make it. 

THE UNITED MOVEMENT 

We can re-make the Theosophical Movement as a united whole. 
Not just you and I, but all the you-and-I’s in the Movement. Two 
years ago Mr. F. Pierce Spinks published a book in America called 
Theosophists Reunite ! It was ‘on the beam’ for the future (42). Great 
store was placed on unity when The Theosophical Society was being 
shaped, not only in principle, but to make things easier in 1975 (32). 
How can theosophical students who proclaim loyalty to Mme 
Blavatsky justify the perpetuation of disunity? It will take goodwill on 
all sides to achieve unity in time for 1975—and it needs to be in good 
time, not a patch-up at the last minute. Arm’s length toleration will 
not do what is needed, even if organizations were merged. We need 
the theosophical large-heartedness that embraces in fraternal 
sympathy those with whom we profoundly disagree, without sur¬ 
rendering our own integrity or expecting them to compromise theirs. 
We need free interplay of minds, so that instead of shut-off com¬ 
partments of thought, we shall come to influence each other honestly 
and gain greater mutual understanding. Out of this, we can come to 
be truly knit together. No one should try to predetermine the pattern 
of integration, because that should emerge from the exchanges of 
thought. We can think about it and advocate it, individually and in 
Lodges, and conceive tentative ways that might work, waiting to see 
‘what will run’. We can treat theosophists outside our Society as 
brother-theosophists. Internationally we can modify our rules and 
resolutions to facilitate growing together. We can live with the idea of 
coming together. There is thinking going on in the United Lodge 
which is helpful to this end (43). There is no reason why different 
ways of working should not go on amicably side by side. We can 


welcome the impact of the United Lodge and other groups upon our 
work. One of the Eastern Adepts gave us wise guidance when 
separative tendencies were at work in the London Lodge: ‘Deluded 
victims of distorted truth, they forget, or never knew, that discord is 
the harmony of the Universe. ... Let meaner natures wrangle if they 
will; the wise compound their differences in a mutually forbearing 
spirit’ ( 44 )- 


THE FUNCTION OF THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY TODAY 

This principle of compounding differences and preserving solidarity 
applies equally within our Society and Lodges as in our relations with 
theosophical students outside our organization. We have adherents 
of various teachers and schools within our Society, and that is right. 
Truth must prevail by its own compelling power. Nothing more is 
claimed for the Blavatsky propoundings than a free platform for 
exposition—nothing more can be allowed to any other. 

The occult teachings are an invitation to the individual to in¬ 
vestigate and verify. Balanced response to them leads to direct 
experience of realities and values. The Theosophical Society will 
stand before the world in its full stature, attracting ‘the attention of 
the highest minds’, as its members show themselves to be men and 
women of sound judgment, neither credulous nor unduly sceptical, 
capable of suspending judgment about statements beyond their 
knowledge either way. Work upon ourselves in these ways is the 
essence of our pathward endeavours, and our supreme purpose must 
be to attract those ready and willing to pass through and beyond con¬ 
sideration of theosophical ideas to the inward recognition and 
realization of spiritual realities; for our Movement fails if it is not a 
recruiting agency for workers prepared to engage in self-training to 
be of increasing use in the world, through knowing spiritual powers 
and allowing them to act in our normal, daily lives. 

In the last published letter from a Master of Wisdom in the 
1875-1900 energization we have a charge: ‘The crest wave of intellec¬ 
tual advancement must be taken hold of and guided into Spirituality. 
It cannot be forced into beliefs and emotional worship. The essence 
of the higher thoughts of the members in their collectivity must 
guide all action in the T.S.... At favourable times we let loose 
elevating influences which strike various persons in various ways. It 


16 



is the collective aspect of many such thoughts that can give the correct 
note of action. . . . The best corrective of error is an open-minded 
examination of all facts subjective and objective’ (45). 

Whilst we pursue our several objects today less as pioneers and 
more as consorts with other groups and societies, we still have our 
distinctive function. We combine three strands of purpose and work 
—promoting the realization of the brotherhood of mankind, the 
inquiry into truth in all religions, philosophies and sciences, and the 
exploration of the unknown or occult aspects of man and nature. 

In pursuing our first object we are inviting study of a teaching that 
makes the basis of this brotherhood so real that every individual 
non-realization of it is seen as beclouded judgment born of self- 
centred mental creations. We are not propounding a mere ideal 
sentiment, but a conception of nature that reveals fundamental unity 
as the very source of all our individual lives and powers. 

In studying comparative religions we are distinguished from 
societies devoted merely to comparison and the discernment of 
similarities by a charge to consider evidences that the elements in 
common point to one primeval Wisdom-Religion, the source in 
common of them all, and hence the radical truth that we all need to 
discover, as individual reality in our own natures and lives. 

In the realm of psychic and occult investigation we are custodians 
of the most coherent and comprehensive theses before the public in 
this age, and we should make the various headquarters of The 
Theosophical Society, and every individual Lodge, centres of whole¬ 
some sanity to which the public naturally turn for elucidation when 
unusual manifestations are reported or occur in their own experiences. 

We can present to honest thinkers conceptions of spiritual and 
psychic realms coherent with modern physics. We can expound an 
inner death-surviving man whose functioning in the outer body 
correlates with the regulatory endocrine system of current physiology. 
We have a doctrine of a host of superphysical intelligences ordering 
the processes of manifestation that is commensurate with the majesty 
of the cosmos as it is being increasingly revealed by astronomy. We 
are equipped to bring the angelic host, the superphysical worlds and 
the spirit and soul of man into coherence with the new images of the 
world in which we live that modern science is producing. We can 
indicate how this world of electromagnetic forces is ensouled by the 
psychodynamic and rooted in an Eternal Source. We have intelligible 


signposts pointing the Way we all have to travel, to become true 
expressions of that Source through our true selves. 

CREST WAVE LODGES 

Whilst every Lodge must be free to follow the line of its own 
collective interest, the more Lodges we have that are in the full 
sweep of current thought and able to take hold of ‘the crest wave of 
intellectual advancement’ and guide it into Spirituality, the more 
completely and adequately we shall fulfil our function. 

To be on the crest wave we must know and realize where public 
education and opinion is up to. To go on plugging what is generally 
accepted is not only a waste of energy, it is a bore. There are deeper 
implications to be expounded no doubt, but to point effectively to 
these we must take for granted what is now w idespread. Television is 
bringing the more intelligent men and women of all social classes 
well up to date on science, on cultivated opinion, and on Christian 
religious thought. In Britain a Daily Mail poll last July revealed a 
general desire for more serious, factual programmes. The Brains 
Trust has an audience of three million; About Religion has five million. 
To be effectual we must know where the television viewer is up to, 
and start from there. 

How far any Lodge can go on its ow r n in relating perennial 
Theosophy to the ever-changing crest of current thought depends on 
the abilities, interests and time-freedom of its members: but the 
Theosophical Movement is a community. We are integrated by our 
common interests. How far Lodges interplay, and serve and share 
with each other, depends partly on willingness and partly on the 
instruments of communication. This is where the world and national 
societies can find their most useful function—as instruments of 
dissemination, putting abroad the most illuminating and informative 
studies from all sources. 

THE BROTHERHOOD OF THE LODGE 

Whilst the intellectual side of our work is a fundamental part of 
our coming together it is not the wdiole, and no Lodge will have the 
vital and vibrant spirit of Theosophy unless there is a growing 
relationship of brotherhood among its members and through them 

18 


for all with whom they are related. This theosophical brotherhood is 
not easy to attain. It is not in being nice so that we are liked, nor in 
patronizing condescension from the heights of learning. We have to 
help one another’s true selves, not pander to the falsities of per¬ 
sonality. Yet we must be forbearing and not hurtful without 
inescapable need. We have to find a poise between independence and 
interdependence, and to help one another as each of us tries to do 
this. See defiant rebelliousness as the struggle to find and become 
true to one’s own real nature. It produces a pseudo-integrity and the 
awakening to that leads to outgrowing it. See servility and obsequious¬ 
ness as the endeavour to find true inter-relations. Eventually the pain 
of it will bring the determination to be inwardly honest, regardless of 
acceptability, in the quest for integrity. Trueness of nature is a whole. 
Each individual nature is truly a facet of the whole, and a facet 
cannot be separated from the whole of which it is but an aspect. 
Integration is therefore dependent upon true inter-relation, the 
mutual assimilation of one another’s integrities. Freedom in isolation 
is a pseudo-freedom. There is true freedom only in a community of 
freedoms. When there is eagerness in a Lodge to help one another 
each on his or her true way, then the spirit of Theosophy pervades 
and redeems the intellectual work of a Lodge, and the Light shines in 
that locality. 


THE OCCULT BROTHERHOOD 

No Lodge of The Theosophical Society truly seeking to develop 
the Theosophical spirit, and to advance the Theosophical purposes, 
stands alone and unwatched. There is a Brotherhood of Guardians of 
Mankind, and their influence is poured upon and blesses every 
group of people genuinely aspiring to achieve a true understanding 
and to serve in community. In our Lodges as we work to true our 
natures and our relationships, we shall do well to remember that in 
the measure of our success we shall be deserving and receiving the 
support of our Greater Brethren who are not visible but whose 
presence can be felt. 

LOYALTY TO MME BLAVATSKY 

It is one of the marks of community that we are grateful. Mme 
Blavatsky was a strange and remarkable woman. Had she been 


19 


conventional and ‘respectable’ she would not have been of use for the 
work she had to do. Only an extraordinary woman could have done 
it; but she was headstrong and impulsive and unguarded in many 
ways, and left herself vulnerable to her enemies. So she suffered 
deeply in transmitting the body of thought which forms the basis of 
our Movement. When we are enlightened and uplifted as we read 
The Secret Doctrine or The Voice of the Silence or her other writings, 
let us remember to be grateful that she had the courage, the dedica¬ 
tion and the pertinacity to go through hell so that we might have help. 

Mme Blavatsky was vilified and our Movement still suffers from 
the mud that was thrown at her. Because she bears the stigma of 
charlatan in the public mind, we who belong to the Society formed 
around her work are dubbed gullible and deluded, and our work is 
under a cloud. It is time she and our Society came from under that 
cloud and into the sunshine. It is time Mme Blavatsky was vindicated, 
and we who are grateful are the ones who must do it. Work is being 
done by devoted men and women to this end. May it quickly come to 
fruition, and may every Lodge be ready to spring into action and 
make the greatest possible corrective impact on the public mind when 
the time comes! 


*975 

What will happen around 1975, who can say? Will the Adept 
Brotherhood then find The Theosophical Movement or Society 
serviceable as an instrument for further dissemination, or will they 
have to by-pass it and start afresh? That probably depends on us—all 
of us who belong to it, here and throughout the world. 

If we get on to the right lines of action, and events begin to move 
towards a rehabilitation and greater respect for Theosophy in the 
public mind, great wisdom and prescience and discrimination will be 
needed. There will be pseudo-messengers no doubt—galore, maybe. 
Vanity and cupidity will see to that. We must strictly avoid 
Messianism. The Adept Brotherhood makes no claim to be able to 
save the world. With Gautama Buddha, they tell us that we have to 
save ourselves. They offer added guidance in the last quarter of each 
century, but it depends on us whether we can discern it and will 
benefit by it. 

For those of us who live in these bodies until then, it will be an 


20 


exhilarating time, a time of much difficulty and trial, and a time 
when, we are told, the doorway between the Occult Guardians and 
mankind will again be open for those who can take the opportunity. 
May all of us who share this vision do our part worthily, to the fullest 
extent that we can, in facilitating the greatest possible benefit for 
mankind from the coming twentieth-century effort of the Masters of 
the Wisdom. We owe so much to them, and wisely skilled labour is 
the fitting expression of our gratitude. 


21 


NOTES AND REFERENCES 


(1) The dialogue on the difference between opinion and knowledge at the 
end of Book 5 of The Republic by Plato is worth re-reading at intervals. 
*. . . matter of opinion*. . . is ‘the intermediate flux which is caught and 
detained by the intermediate faculty.’ ‘. . . those who love the truth in 
each thing are to be called lovers of wisdom and not lovers of opinion.* 
(Jowett’s translation.) Compare Mme Blavatsky: ‘Every true fact is 
part and parcel of Theosophy.* 

(2) The Complete Works of H. P. Blavatsky , Vol. 1, p. 275. From Vol. 5 
onwards, when the editing passed from Mr. A. Trevor Barker to Mr. 
Boris de Zirkoff, The Complete Works became Collected Writings. 

(3) She describes ‘faith on authority* as ‘a mental disease’ in Section XI of 
The Key to Theosophy , contrasting it with ‘faith on one’s spiritual 
intuition*. 

(4) Compare Emerson on Self-Reliance : ‘Whoso would be a man, must be 
a nonconformist.* 

(5) Quoted by A.I.R. in Lucifer , Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 57. It appears also in The 
Theosophist y Vol. 1, No. 1, in slightly different form, partly in What is 
Theosophy ; and partly in What are the Theosophists? y both by Mme 
Blavatsky. See The Complete Works , Vol. 1, pp. 294, 305. I have not 
found the quotation in A. E. Waite’s edition of The Works of Thomas 
Vaughan. 

(6) The Voice of the Silence , 1st edn., p. 1. 

(7) Idem, p. 5. 

(8) The Secret Doctrine , 3rd edn., Vol. 3, p. 412; 4th (Adyar) edn. (1938), 
Vol. 5, p. 396. It should be noted that this so-called third volume is not 
the completion of The Secret Doctrine as H. P. Blavatsky intended it, 
for she planned four volumes; nor is it part of the work as she published 
it. It is a compilation from posthumous papers and esoteric instructions, 
edited by another mind. 

(9) Collected Writings, Vol. 8, p. 402. 

(10) The Secret Doctrine , 1st edn., Vol. 1, pp. xxxvii-xxxviii footnote; 
3rd edn., p. 21; 4th (Adyar) edn., pp. 59-60. The words in brackets are 
emendations in the 3rd and 4th edns. 

(11) The Preliminary Memorandum of the Esoteric Section. 

(12) The Key to Theosophy , 1st edn. (1889), p. 306; U.L.T. Indian edn. 
(1930, P- 256. 

(13) The Comte de St.-Ger?tmin y by I. Cooper-Oakley, pp. 130-7* Saint- 
Martin’s Theosophical Correspondence was reissued in 1949 by The 
Theosophical Society (Covina). 

(14) See A New Encyclopaedia of Freemasonry , by A. E. Waite, Vol. 2, p. 401. 

(15) Idem , p. 46. 

(16) Introduction by F. N. Pryce, m.a., to the reprint (1923) of The Fame 
and Confession of the Fraternity of R.C. y pp. 12, 15. 

(17) Idem , pp. 35-6, 41. 

(18) Idem , pp. 9, 57. 

(19) See The Brotherhood of the Rosy Cross , by A. E. Waite, p. 116. 

(20) Idem, pp. 71-3. 

(21) The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett y 1st edn., p. 434. 

(22) The Occult World , by A. P. Sinnett, 1921 reprint, pp. 114. 116. 


22 


(23) The Secret Doctrine , ist edn., Vol. i, p. 646; 3rd., Vol. 1, p. 708; 4th 
(Adyar) edn., Vol. 2, p. 371. 

(24) The Theosophical Glossary , Krotona (1918) reprint, p. 287. 

(25) The Mahatma Letters , p. 156. 

(26) Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom (First Series), 4th end., pp. 23, 
21, 23. 

(27) The Mahatma Letters, p. 365. 

(28) Lucifer , Vol. 4, p. 188. 

(29) The Key to Theosophy , ist edn., p. 307; U.L.T. Indian edn. (1931), 
pp. 256-7. 

(30) The Secret Doctrine , 3rd edn., Vol. 3, p. 23; 4th (Adyar) edn. (1938), 
Vol. 5, p. 45. Although the date of recording is not given, the following 
passage from A Treatise on the Seven Rays, Vol. 5, pp. 237-8, written 
down by Alice Bailey and attributed to Djwal Kul, appears to be 
related to the same deadline: 

\ .. great expansions of consciousness ... in the human under¬ 
standing will, in the next one hundred and fifty years, completely 
alter the manner of man’s thinking; they will change the techniques 
of religion; they will bring about comprehension and fusion. When 
this work has been accomplished we shall record an era of world 
peace which will be symbolic of the state of the human spirit. Men 
will then settle down to the great task which confronts all of us in the 
New Age—the task of dissipating glamour and of bringing about a 
clearer light upon the astral plane, in the same way that better 
physical conditions will have been brought about upon the physical 
plane. . . . The Hierarchy works ever under the law of cycles and of 
cyclic compensation. The Masters know exactly that which must be 
done by right timing.* 

(31) See The Sacred Mushroom , by Andrija Puharich, pp. 10-5, 43-5, 69-70, 

123-4- 

(32) See The Mahatma Letters , pp. 317-19, 400-2; The Key to Theosophy , 
Conclusion, and Five Messages to the American Theosophists (1930 
reprint, Bombay), pp. 16-17, 28. 

(33) See Man y Whence , How and Whither , by Annie Besant and C. W. 
Leadbeater, ist edn., p. v; The Astral Plane , by C. W. Leadbeater, 
p. 10; The Theosophical Student, by Annie Besant, pp. 8, 15-16. 
‘Observations by students using superphysical faculties* should be held 
‘with a light grasp, as hypotheses temporarily accepted until confirmed 
or negated by further observations. . . . Study these books, but do not 
swallow them; understand them but hold your judgment in suspense . . . 
There is a dangerous tendency ... to make books of observations 
authoritative instead of using them as materials for study. We must not 
add to the number of blind believers . . . but to the number of sane and 
sober students . . .* 

(34) Op. cit., ist edn., p. 82. 

(35) The Secret Doctrine , 3rd edn., Vol. 3, p. 416, footnote; 4th (Adyar) edn., 
Vol. 5, p. 399- 

(36) As (35); The Voice of the Silence, ist edn., pp. 43, 86; The Theosophical 
Glossary , Krotona reprint, p. 243. The attempted reconciliation by 
Arya Asanga (A. J. Hamester) in the Introduction to the Adyar Golden 
Jubilee (1939) edition of The Voice of the Silence is unsatisfying, but the 
deletions from the text were restored. 


23 


( 37 ) Op. cit., p. 114. 

(38) See Talks on the Path of Occultism , p. 483. 

(39) See The Masters and the Path, 1st edn., diagram 4 facing p. 301, 
pp. 363» 3^6, 368-9. According to The Secret Doctrine there are seven 
Kumaras, four exoteric and three esoteric, but the names are ‘all aliases'. 
‘Occasionally five ... are mentioned ... in the exoteric texts*, and 
esoterically ‘they are five, because the last two names have ever been 
kept secret*. ‘They are five , because two of the Kumaras fell.* Sanaka 
or Sanatkumara come first of the exoteric four in various listings, but 
Sanaka is the chief, and prototype of St. Michael. Sanatsujata is one of 
the esoteric three. Confusion enters with the so-called third volume, 
where Sanat-Kumara is given as the chief and equated with St. Michael, 
and with Sanat Sujata, despite a footnote on the same page which lists 
the two separately; but see note (8) above. (The Secret Doctrine, 1st edn., 
Vol. 1, pp. 89, 236, 372, 457-8; Vol. 2, pp. 577-8; 3rd edn., Vol. 1, 
pp. 116-17, 257, 399, 494; Vol. 2, p. 610; Vol. 3, p. 327; 4th (Adyar) 
edn., Vol. 1, pp. 153, 282; Vol. 2, pp. 87, 176-7; Vol. 4, p. 149; Vol. 5, 
p. 320.) Apart from the Pratyeka Buddha tie-up, consistency between 
Mr. Leadbeater and The Secret Doctrine on the Kumaras therefore 
relies on the confused reference in the posthumous papers of the so- 
called third volume, as against the footnote on Vol. 1, p. 372, of the 
first edition, unless ‘the first’ on p. 458 is called in; but there seems no 
need to read more into that than the first-named in the list as there 
given. Controversy about such exalted beings is distasteful, and some 
such ordering of responsibilities as Mr. Leadbeater described may well 
exist. The question is whether or not he got it right. It is wise to suspend 
judgment when one does not know. 

(40) See A Treatise on Cosmic Fire y pp. 74, 75, 1239: yet The Theosophical 
Glossary is quoted (p. 74) in clear conflict with the text. 

(41) See ‘Are Chelas “Mediums” *? in Collected Writings , Vol. 6, pp. 223-7. 
‘A person may consciously and voluntarily submit his will to another 
being. . . . This “other being” may be the man’s own higher principle, 
either alone or put into rapport with another ray of the collective 
universal spiritual principle. . .. This “other being” may be one of 
those exalted beings, called Mahatmas, and the conscious and voluntary 
medium will then be called their “Chela”.. . . He may be under the 
influence of his own seventh principle and imagine to be in com¬ 
munication with a personal Jesus Christ or a saint. . . . He may be 
influenced by some Adept to write a great scientific work and be 
entirely ignorant of the source of his inspiration . ..’ This valuable 
article was included with two others in U.L.T. Pamphlet No. 13, 
issued from Bombay. Our Adyar Society could well distribute this if in 
print, or alternatively reprint it for wider dissemination. Alice Bailey 
had absorbed the Leadbeater hierarchical schemata. Colouration from 
her consciousness is possible, whether her attributing of the source of 
inspiration is correct or not. 

(42) He is now publishing a quarterly bulletin, with the same title, from 
1508 Notre Dame Avenue, Belmont, California, U.S.A. 

(43) See Theosophy, January 1961, pp. 127-30. 

(44) The Mahatma Letters , pp. 401, 409. 

(45) Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom (First Series), 4th edn., 
pp. 111-12. 


24 


OTHER BLAVATSKY LECTURES 


THE METAPHYSICS OF EXPERIENCE, by Basil P. Howell, 
M.B.E. Price 2s. Post 2d. 

WHENCE COME THE GODS? and Related Studies, by E. L. 
Gardner. Price 5s. Post 4d. 

PHYSICAL FORCES AND SPIRITUAL INTELLIGENCES. 
“Science does not deal with ultimate origins”, by K. 
Cliodkiewicz. Price Is. 6d. Post 2d. 

THE REIGN OF THE SPIRIT, a Study of the Individual 
Approach, by Dudley G. Gower. Price Is. 6d. Post 2d. 

THE OPENING OF THE DOORS OF THE MIND, by L. C. 
Soper. Price Is. 6d. Post 2d. 

PURPOSE BEYOND REASON, by Hugh Shearman, B.A., Ph.D. 
Price Is. 6d. Post 2d. 

THE YOGA OF THE SERPENT FIRE, by Ed. Gall. Price Is. 
Post 2d. 

BROTHERHOOD AND THE ENLIGHTENED MIND, by Doris 
Groves. Price Is. 6d. Post 2d. 

MAN, CREATOR OF FORMS, by V. Wallace Slater, B.Sc., 
F.R.I.C. Price 2s. Post 2d. 

THE SCIENCE OF SPIRITUALITY, by lantlie H. Hoskins, M.A. 
Price 2s. Post 2d. 

ADAM, THE PRODIGAL SON, a Study of Man, by Laurence J. 
Bendit, M.D. Price 2s. Post 2d. 

ON ORDER AND PURPOSE IN EVOLUTION, by C. R. Groves, 
M.Sc. Price 2s. Post 2d. 

THE MYSTERY RELIGIONS, a Study in Regeneration, its 
Experiences and Implications, bv Charlotte Woods. Price 2s. 
Post 2d. 

THE POWER OF LOVE IN THE STRUGGLE FOR LIGHT, by 
Greta Eedle. Price Is. 3d. Post 2d. 

THEOSOPHY AND THE WESTERN MYSTERIES, by G. Nevin 
Drinkwater. Price Is. 6d. Post 2d. 

THEOSOPHY AND THE CHANGING OUTLOOK IN SCIENCE, 
by Corona Trew, B.Sc., Ph.D. Price Is. Post 2d. 

THE DIRECTION OF THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY BY 
THE MASTERS OF THE WISDOM, by Josephine Ransom. 
Price Is. Post 2d. 

THE OCCULT TEACHINGS OF THE CHRIST—According to 
the Secret Doctrine, by Josephine Ransom. Price 2s. 6d. 
Post 2d. 

INDICATIONS OF A NEW CULTURE, by Adelaide Gardner, 
B.A. Price 6d. Post 2d. 


THE THEOSOPHICAL PUBLISHING HOUSE, LONDON, LTD. 
68 Greal Russell Street, London, W.C.l